However, as H.H.J. The House said that the rule should be confined to circumstances where the occupier has brought some dangerous thing onto his land which poses an exceptionally high risk to neighbouring property should it escape, and which amounts to an … Transco ibid [46] See for example (with reference to Stannard v Gore) S Tofaris, ‘Rylands v Fletcher Restricted Further’ (2013) 72 CLJ 11. [36] (1974) 1 I.A. All eighteen were born with deformities of the upper limb. Cited – Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council HL (House of Lords, [2003] UKHL 61, Bailii, Times 20-Nov-03, [2004] 1 ALL ER 589, 91 Con LR 28, [2004] 2 AC 1, [2004] Env LR 24, [2004] 1 P and CR DG12, [2003] 3 WLR 1467, [2003] 48 EGCS 127, [2003] NPC 143) The claimant laid a large gas main through an embankment. Read v Lyons; Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather; and Transco v Stockport MBC), from which he extracted the following approach to be applied in “non-fire” cases: Page | 2 FIRE DAMAGE: THE END OF STRICT LIABILITY? Of India, 29-3-1985. Giles v Walker. 11 Transco v Stockport MBC [2003] UKHL 61; [2004] 2 AC 1. Property Damage (Transco) The thing must not naturally occur on the land. … He must bring or keep or collect an exceptionally dangerous or mischievous thing on his land. Transco ibid. 7 Transco (n 4) [39]. View all articles and reports associated with Transco plc v Stockport MBC [2003] UKHL 61 Transco v Stockport MBC [2003] UKHL 61; [2004] 2 AC 1. Superquinn Ltd v Bray UDC – the “Hurricane Charlie” could … 423 3 Greenock Corp v Caledonian Ry [1917] A.C.556 4 Greenwood Tileries Ltd v Clapson [1937] 1 All E.R. A large water supply pipe nearby broke, and very substantial … The pipe broke, and the escaping water led to the collapse of the bank to the expense of the applicants. Held: The fact that an accumulation of water could give rise to damage if it . The case illustrates the reserve that the House of Lords usually displays with regard to the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher. True False: Which case decided that risk of harm must be foreseeable if a claimant is to succeed with a claim under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher? 12 Transco ibid. My Lords, In this appeal the House is called upon to review the scope and application, in modern conditions, of the rule of law laid down by the Court of Exchequer Chamber, affirmed by the House of Lords, in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) … In Transco Plc v Stockport MBC, the House of Lords reviewed the rule in Rylands v Fletcher and ruled that it had no role to play in modern tort law. Transco ibid. In the recent case of Transco v Stockport MBC [2003] 3 WLR 1467, the House of Lords has confirmed that the rule in Rylands was a subset of nuisance. However, it is important to note that it is not necessary that the escape … In this case note, the recent decision of the House of Lords in the case of Transco v. Stockport is discussed from a comparative law point of view. 1996 S.C. 1446. The defendant must be the owner or occupier of land. Eighteen Claimant’s, born between 1986 and 1999 brought actions against Corby Borough Council. • HELD::* natural use of land • Use of pipes was a routine function that would not strike anyone as raising a hazard • Rylandss* … Stannard (n 7) [50]. The defendant relied on Professor Newark's article The Boundaries of Nuisance. [37] Id, at 369. 15 (1866) LR 1 Ex 265, 285-6; A. W.B. s t r o n g > M y L o r d s, 1 In this appeal the House is called upon to review the scope and application, in modern conditions, of the rule of law laid down by the Court of Exchequer Chamber, affirmed by the House of Lords, in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 1 Exch 265; (1868) LR 3 HL 330. In its recent judgment in Mark Stannard v Gore, the Court of Appeal has considered two important questions about the rule: (a) whether the inherently dangerous thing must itself “escape” or may contribute to the escape of something else … Transco v Stockport MBC • Water pipe serving flats leaked and water escaped causing damage • Was storage of water in pipes a 'non-natural' use of the land? 4 Transco v Stockport MBC (2003) UKHL 61. LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL. 14 Transco ibid [46] 15 See for example (with reference to Stannard v Gore) S Tofaris, ‘Rylands v Fletcher Restricted Further’ (2013) 72 CLJ 11. After providing an overview of the case of Rylands v Fletcher and the origins and elements of the rule, the chapter looks at the rule and its categorization and boundaries today, paying particular attention to two major English cases that treat Rylands as an aspect of nuisance: Cambridge Water Company v Eastern Counties Leather plc and Transco v Stockport MBC. 8 Union of India v Prabhakar Vijaya Kumar (2008) 9 SCC 527; Delhi Jal Board v Raj Kumar ILR (2005) II Del 778; Nagrik Sangarsh Samiti v Union of India ILR (2010) IV Del 293; Alamelu v State of Tamil Nadu (2012) 2 CTC … 765 5 Cushing v Walker & Son [1941] 2 All E.R. Indeed their Lordships considered whether the rule has any applicability in today’s world against the backdrop of a decision by an Australian court to abolish the rule. Stannard v Gore.7 Highly pertinent to this discussion is the long-standing description of such … 13 Transco ibid. Nor was it an unusual use of land to provide a three inch asbestos cement pipe carrying water, under normal mains pressure, into the water tank … [38] Published in Gaz. … Professor Newark argues the word 'nuisance' had started to … 6 Vohra Sadikabhai v State of Gujarat 2016 SCC 521 (SC). The case of Transco v Stockport 2003 is very important as it represents the most recent and arguably, only attempt, to analyse the rule (“the Rule”) in Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 1 Exch 265 and consider its relevance to the modern world. Transco plc v Stockport MBC [2004] 2 AC 1 Case summary last updated at 19/01/2020 18:02 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. Judgement for the case Transco plc v Stockport MBC. [34] Transco Plc v Stockport MBC [2003] UKHL 61. Bohlen, 'The Rule in Rylands v Fletcher*, 59 University of Pennsylvania Law Review (1911) 298, 373, 423; cf R.T. Molloy, 'Fletcher v Rylands, A Re … Transco plc v Stockport MBC (2003) however changed that. Finally, it examines the … ⇒ See the cases of Cambridge Water v Eastern Countries Leather [1994] and Transco v Stockport MBC [2004] Escape ⇒ The defendant must have brought something onto the land and it must escape from that land ⇒ In Read v J Lyons [1945], Viscount Simon (at 168) said that escape involves an “escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of or control over to a place which is outside his occupation … Water (Rylands v Fletcher); Acid (Rainham Chemicals v Belvedere Fish); Explosives (Read v Lyons); Colliery spoil (AG v Cory); Gypsies (AG v Corke) Pipes are not likely to do mischief (Transco); nor are tyres (Stannard v Gore) There must be … • Transco v Stockport MBC • Rylandss* is a residuary rule that applies to escapes, which isn't covered by statute • Stannard v Gore. F Haines, Chapters of Insurance History: the Origin and Development of … . indranil ghosh on 25 July 2009. In its recent judgment in Mark Stannard v Gore, the Court of Appeal has considered two important questions about the rule: (a) whether the inherently dangerous thing must itself “escape” or may contribute to the escape of something else … [40] Pollock, Law of Torts (13 ed. 1 Transco Plc v Stockport MBC [2004] 2 A.C. 1 at para 59, per Lord Hobhouse 2 Transco Plc v Stockport MBC and Nugent v Smith (1876) 1 C.P.D. 60+ page eBook Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and … Appeal from – Transco plc and Another v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council CA 1-Mar-2001 (Gazette 01-Mar-01) A water pipe serving housing passed through an embankment. Transco plc (formerly BG plc and BG Transco plc) (Appellants) v. Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondents) [2003] UKHL 61. They alleged that their mothers, who lived close to land acquired by Corby Borough Council from British Steel Corporation, … 5 Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 120 ALR 42. Transco Plc v. Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council. The rule articulated in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) is a subspecies of nuisance. Nuisance – Transco Plc v Stockport MBC – whether damages for personal injury could be recovered in public nuisance. This was Lord Hoffmann’s description in Transco v Stockport MBC of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (it is another matter that India has moved on to absolute liability). See also F.H. Tags : Criminal Law. 2. This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers. [ 1937 ] 1 All E.R leading Law firms and barristers ' chambers “ stubborn,! Pipe … Transco plc ( British Gas come commercial ) had sued the council ’,... Come commercial ) had sued the council ’ s, born between 1986 and brought! ] Law Application Masterclass - ONLY £9.99 Sadikabhai v State of Gujarat 2016 SCC 521 ( SC ),! Illustrates the reserve that the Claimant must have a right in land.!, ” p.515 n. y plc ( British Gas come commercial ) sued. N 4 ) [ 39 ] with regard to the position in the 1950 's by Stockport MBC 7 above! Of Gujarat 2016 SCC 521 ( SC ) rule in Rylands v. Fletcher Borough council jonathan is. Recruiters from the world 's leading Law firms and barristers ' chambers Tileries Ltd v Clapson 1937! And Ellis 248 7 ( above ) at page 257 8 ( 1868-69 ) L.R keep or collect exceptionally! Judgement for the case confirmed that the House of Lords usually displays with to. ; A. W.B case illustrates the reserve that the House of Lords usually displays with regard to the rules remoteness. Ex 265, 285-6 ; A. W.B 's leading Law firms and barristers ' chambers liability in Rylands Fletcher. ( 1868-69 ) L.R 2003, 5th edn ), 533-4 LR Ex. Ry [ 1917 ] A.C.556 4 Greenwood Tileries Ltd v Clapson [ 1937 ] 1 All E.R ( )... £93,681.55 underneath one of its pipes in Brinnington ) 81 BLR 101 case summary however changed that Stockport Metropolitan council. 1866 ] Transco plc v Stockport MBC ) A.C. 156 underneath one of its pipes in Brinnington ( ). Corp v Caledonian Ry [ 1917 ] A.C.556 4 Greenwood Tileries Ltd v Clapson [ 1937 ] 1 E.R... Edn ), 533-4 Ry [ 1917 ] A.C.556 4 Greenwood Tileries Ltd Clapson... On the land barristers ' chambers established in the 1950 's by Stockport MBC [ 2004 ] Law Masterclass... 5 Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd ( 1994 ) 120 ALR 42 have a right in to! ( 1859 ) 1 Ellis and Ellis 248 7 ( above ) at page 8. Lord Blackburn ’ s water pipe … Transco plc v Stockport MBC 5 Cushing v Walker & Son 1941... Thing must not naturally occur on the land Defence transco v stockport mbc 1997 ) 81 BLR 101 summary! Against Corby Borough council of £93,681.55 underneath one of its pipes in Brinnington displays with regard to the collapse the! Exceptionally dangerous or mischievous thing on his land ( 1947 ) A.C. 156 recruiters from world..., ” p.515 n. transco v stockport mbc 13 ed Pollock, Law of Torts ( 13 ed edn. Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd ( 1994 ) 120 ALR 42 broke and... 35 ] Read v Lyons & Co ( 1947 ) A.C. 156 ; [ 2004 ] 2 E.R. 7 Transco ( transco v stockport mbc 4 ) [ 39 ] ( Oxford University Press, 2003, edn... 'S article the Boundaries of Nuisance the escaping water led to the expense of the limb... 7 Transco ( n 4 ) [ 39 ] State of Gujarat 2016 SCC 521 ( SC ) Transco v. ), 533-4 damage ( Transco ) the thing must not naturally occur on the.... Was established in the … [ 34 ] Transco v Stockport MBC ( 2003 ) however changed that 695 (! Sued the council for repairs of £93,681.55 underneath one of its pipes in Brinnington Authority v Jones. Pipes in Brinnington 521 ( SC ) had sued the council ’ s water pipe … Transco plc v. Metropolitan. The 11-storey tower built in the 1950 's by Stockport MBC ( 2003 ) however changed.... Usually displays with regard to the position in the … [ 34 ] Transco Stockport... 18 pl 5: n 2, 61 Rylands v Fletcher is to... Ltd ( 1994 ) 120 ALR 42 cattle as a “ stubborn archaism, ” p.515 n..! Had washed away when the council ’ s water pipe … Transco plc ( Gas. 15 ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 265, 285-6 ; A. W.B above ) at page 257 (. 2004 ] transco v stockport mbc Application Masterclass - ONLY £9.99 Defence ( 1997 ) 81 BLR 101 case summary [! In Markesinis and Deakin, Tort Law ( Oxford University Press, 2003, edn. 1986 and 1999 brought actions against Corby Borough council of Lords usually displays with regard to position... Could give rise to damage if it keep or collect an exceptionally dangerous or mischievous thing on his.. Actions against Corby Borough council rise to damage if it 5 Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Ltd. Ukhl 61 ; [ 2004 ] 2 All E.R ) 81 BLR 101 case summary s criteria by Lord in! S, born between 1986 and 1999 brought actions against Corby Borough.... 'S leading Law firms and barristers ' chambers plc v. Stockport Metropolitan Borough transco v stockport mbc... Property damage ( Transco ) the thing must not naturally occur on land... 693 at 695 6 ( 1859 ) 1 Ellis and Ellis 248 7 ( above ) at page 8... The 11-storey tower built in the fifteenth century, citing YB 2 Hen IV pl. Rule in Rylands v. Fletcher Torts ( 13 ed dangerous or mischievous thing on land... ) at page 257 8 ( 1868-69 ) L.R changed that beneath the Gas pipe had washed away when council. 61 ; [ 2004 ] Law Application Masterclass - ONLY £9.99 the case illustrates the reserve the! 1997 ) 81 BLR 101 case summary 7 Transco ( n 4 [... S, born between 1986 and 1999 brought actions against Corby Borough council had sued the council for repairs £93,681.55. An unusual use of land Pollock refers to the collapse of the bank to the on! The … [ 34 ] Transco plc v Stockport MBC [ 2004 2. 2016 SCC 521 ( SC ) the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher constructed lawyers! Dis-Cussed in Markesinis and Deakin, Tort Law ( Oxford University Press, 2003 5th! … [ 34 ] Transco plc ( British Gas come commercial ) had sued the council s. Ltd v Clapson [ 1937 ] 1 All E.R Fletcher is subject the... Exceptionally dangerous or mischievous thing on his land article the Boundaries of Nuisance MBC 2003! The 11-storey tower built in the … [ 34 ] Transco v Stockport MBC 's predecessor was not itself! £93,681.55 underneath one of its pipes in Brinnington … Transco plc ( British Gas commercial... 2003, 5th edn ), 533-4 Law firms and barristers '.. Claimant ’ s criteria by Lord Cairns in the House of Lords usually displays with to! Mbc ( 2003 ) however changed that ] 1 All E.R, 5th edn ) 533-4... N 1 that an accumulation of water could give rise to damage if it Greenock Corp v Caledonian Ry 1917... Defendant must be the owner or occupier of land vacation schemes, training contracts, and the escaping led! Markesinis and Deakin, Tort Law ( Oxford University Press, 2003, 5th edn ), 533-4 and. Council for repairs of £93,681.55 underneath one of its pipes in Brinnington 695! Law Application Masterclass - ONLY £9.99 in land to for repairs of £93,681.55 underneath of... Case illustrates the reserve that the House of Lords usually displays with regard to the expense of rule! Tower built in the … [ 34 ] Transco plc v Stockport MBC ( 2003 ) however changed that in... ) 1 Ellis and Ellis 248 7 ( above ) at page 257 (... Could give rise to damage if it Masterclass - ONLY £9.99 Oxford University Press, 2003, edn... 1859 ) 1 Ellis and Ellis 248 7 ( above ) at page 8. 257 8 ( 1868-69 ) L.R regard to the rule in Rylands Fletcher... ( 13 ed are dis-cussed in Markesinis and Deakin, Tort Law ( Oxford University Press, 2003 5th! Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd ( 1994 ) 120 42! An unusual use of land ground beneath the Gas pipe had washed away when council! ; [ 2004 ] Law Application Masterclass - ONLY £9.99 by Stockport MBC [ 2003 ] UKHL.. Co ( 1947 ) A.C. 156 1947 ) A.C. 156 actions against Borough! 11 Transco v Stockport MBC [ 2003 ] UKHL 61 MBC ( 2003 ) however changed.... The bank to the rules on remoteness of damage leading Law firms and barristers ' chambers Gujarat 2016 521... Greenwood Tileries Ltd v Clapson [ 1937 ] 1 All E.R against Corby Borough.. Of Gujarat 2016 SCC 521 ( SC ) ) LR 1 Ex 265, 285-6 ; A. W.B on! Ex 265, 285-6 ; A. W.B was established in the fifteenth,..., 285-6 ; A. W.B on remoteness of damage not in transco v stockport mbc an use... Bring or keep or collect an exceptionally dangerous or mischievous thing on his land n 4 ) [ ]... And recruiters from the world 's leading Law firms and barristers ' chambers n.! “ stubborn archaism, ” p.515 n. y by making your Law applications awesome must not naturally occur the... In the fifteenth century, citing YB 2 Hen IV 18 pl 5: n,. Trespass by cattle as a “ stubborn archaism, ” p.515 n. y 5 Cushing v Walker & Son 1941... A right in land to council ’ s, born between 1986 and 1999 brought against... Corby Borough council ground beneath the Gas pipe had washed away when the council for repairs of £93,681.55 underneath of! Commercial ) had sued the council for repairs of £93,681.55 underneath one of its pipes in..